Plastic Bottles Avoided

use code:


use code:


use code:


Why TDS is a poor measure of water quality

Why TDS is a poor measure of water quality

Many water amateurs and companies that want to promote water filters for tap water use TDS (Total Dissolved Solids) as the key water quality testing method. The reason is that it’s very easy and cheap to measure. The problem is that this is not a good measure and it’s very limited in terms of water quality parameters.

Below is a simplified explanation of what TDS is and to what extent it should be used as a water quality measure.

What is TDS?

TDS comprise of inorganic salts and small amounts of organic matter that are dissolved in water. The principal constituents are usually the cations calcium, magnesium, sodium and potassium and the anions carbonate, bicarbonate, chloride, sulphate and, particularly in groundwater, nitrate. TDS is expressed in units of mg per unit volume of water (mg/L) or also referred to as parts per million (ppm).

Typically, natural mineral water and tap water can have a TDS value of 100-200 mg/l. In areas with high concentration of minerals, the natural tap water could however be considerably higher. Water filtering technologies such as reverse osmosis, water distillation and ion exchange can reduce this to close to zero, whereas active carbon filters will not filter out TDS.

So is a higher level of TDS good or bad?

Just like most bottled mineral water contains higher TDS (e.g. Evian 300 mg/l; San Pellegrino 850 mg/l), this can also be positive for tap water. WHO and most other institutions that regulate water quality consider values up to 500 mg/l to be entirely safe and 2,000 mg/l safe for temporary consumption in case no other water is available.

For values below 500 mg/l there is no scientific evidence that TDS makes any difference, and no health impact has been identified below 2,000 mg/l. To complicate this a little bit there is however evidence that high concentrations of specific constituents such as calcium may have an impact, but TDS is a very vague indicator of this, since it does not specify the different parameters that constitute the final number.

In a study by the World Health Organization, a panel of tasters came to the following conclusions about the preferable level of TDS in water (mg/l):

  • Less than 300: Excellent
  • 300 – 600: Good
  • 600 – 900: Fair
  • 900 – 1,200: Poor
  • Above 1,200: Unacceptable

For example, tap water in Los Angeles varies between 200-600 mg/l, Paris 200-300 mg/l, Stockholm 73-93 mg/l, London 260 mg/l… and all of them are considered to have safe and healthy drinking water.

It’s worth noting that higher TDS waters usually have a heavier taste and a much more prominent “mouthfeel,” a term used by water connoisseurs to describe the overall sensory impression.

Why TDS is a poor measure of water quality

Why do water filter companies and amateurs use high TDS as an argument for water filtration?

The simple reason is that it’s cheap and easy to test. A TDS meter can be purchased online for about $50 or less, and then anyone can easily perform a test in seconds at home.

Real tests that measure chlorine, pesticides, heavy metals and pharmaceuticals, which are important to determine water quality, require sophisticated and expensive labs. Your local water company tests the water every day for contaminants and is obliged to provide a water quality report, at least, yearly. This provides a scientific analysis of the water quality.

What do I do to get accurate water quality testing?

In conclusion, water quality testing is important, but think twice before using TDS as an indicator or complement it with other technologies. Generally, the belief that high TDS is bad is based on misconceptions about the negative health impact of minerals in the body.

If you want to learn more about the water quality in your area, visit the EWG website all you need is a U.S. zipcode.

If you would like to do a test yourself in order to assess potential leakages of heavy metals from the pipes of your building (such as calcium, magnesium, chlorine, nitrate, sulfate, fluoride, sodium, copper or nickel) you can purchase a detailed DIY testing kit from Tap Score here


WHO, EU Water Framework, EPA

Share this post

1 thought on “Why TDS is a poor measure of water quality”

  1. Gerard Martins

    Why not just measure the Electrical Conductivity (EC) with a calibrated probe/AC (60/1kHz depending on the EC range), and employ EC for water-quality control? Is it that “old (familiar) habits die hard”?
    Baffling to me — two decades into the 21st. Century, considering how the cost of electronic-instrumentation devices have dramatical decreased during the last decade!!
    G.P. Martins– Professor Emeritus.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Transform your tap water into Clean, Great-Tasting,
and Plastic-Free Drinking Water.

Now available in the US

Limited stock